9.1
53.2 %
88.5 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 53.2%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 0.8 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 16.5 | 45.5% | 0.9 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 6.9 | 4.4 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 26.8 | 58.0% | 0.9 |
| Conference paper, other | 0.5 | NA | 2.0 | NA | 1.6 | NA | 0.2 | 4.3 | 5.8% | 0.1 |
| Chapter in book | NA | 0.3 | NA | 0.5 | NA | 1.5 | NA | 2.3 | 21.4% | 0.6 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 2 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 44 | 59.1% | 1 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 15 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 59 | 59.3% | 1 |
| Conference paper, other | 1 | NA | 3 | NA | 3 | NA | 1 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 |
| Chapter in book | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 2 | NA | 4 | 25.0% | 1 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3.8 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 56.5% |
| 2015 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 23.5% |
| 2016 | 3.2 | 7.7 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 51.5% |
| 2017 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 63.0% |
| 2018 | 3.0 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 77.1% |
| Total | 16.8 | 21.4 | 1.3 | 8.6 | 51.5% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 1.5 | 0.65 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2015-2017 | 1.6 | 0.67 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2016-2018 | 2.4 | 0.86 | 0.2 | 8.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 2.8 | 0.67 | 0.2 | 7.5% |
| Total | 4.3 | 0.66 | 0.2 | 4.9% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 5 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 38.7%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 35.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 1.5 | 1.21 | 0.3 | 20.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 1.6 | 1.11 | 0.3 | 18.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 2.4 | 0.98 | 0.3 | 12.9% |
| 2017-2019 | 2.8 | 0.56 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2018-2020 | 5.4 | 0.62 | 0.5 | 9.3% |
| Total | 7.4 | 0.72 | 0.8 | 11.0% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 35.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 2015-2017 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% | 6 | 100.0% |
| 2016-2018 | 9 | 0 | 0.0% | 9 | 100.0% |
| 2017-2019 | 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 7 | 70.0% |
| 2018-2020 | 18 | 1 | 5.6% | 13 | 72.2% |
| Total | 25 | 1 | 4.0% | 20 | 80.0% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 47.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 22 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.1 |
| China | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Italy | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| United States | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Germany | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Denmark | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Poland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Estonia | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Kenya | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Spain | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Uganda | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Austria | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Canada | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| India | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Ireland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Singapore | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delft University of Technology | University | Netherlands | 22 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.1 |
| Uppsala University | University | Sweden | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| ProRail | Other Public | Netherlands | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Kenteq | Company | Netherlands | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Beihang University | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Northeastern Univ Qinhuangdao | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Northeastern University | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Marche Polytechnic University | University | Italy | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) | University | Bangladesh | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Radboud University Nijmegen | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Stevens Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Sveriges Kommuner Och Landsting | NA | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Karolinska Institutet | University | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| George Washington University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| SWPS Univ Social Sci & Humanities | University | Poland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Thales Research and Technology | Company | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Bremen | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Kenyatta University (KU) | University | Kenya | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Uganda Industrial Research Institute (UIRI) | Other Public | Uganda | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Pisa | University | Italy | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Tartu | University | Estonia | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Norwegian University of Science and Technology | University | Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Shandong University of Finance and Economics | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Technical University of Denmark (DTU) | University | Denmark | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Groningen | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Vienna University of Economics and Business | University | Austria | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| NA | NA | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| NA | NA | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Technical University of Madrid | University | Spain | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA) | University College | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences | University College | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero (BiPCa) | Other | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Polytechnic University of Turin | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Copenhagen University Hospitals | University Hospital | Denmark | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Hong Kong Polytechnic University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Karolinska University Hospital | University Hospital | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Sophiahemmet University College | University College | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Stockholms Sjukhem | Other health services | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Swedish Red Cross | Other health services | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Umeå University | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Copenhagen | University | Denmark | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) | University | Spain | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg | University | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Australian National University | University | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Carnegie Mellon University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation | Other Public | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Georgia Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| IBM Corp | Company | India | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| IBM Corp | Company | Ireland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| McGill University | University | Canada | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Microsoft Corporation | Company | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Nanyang Technological University | University | Singapore | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| National Information and Communications Technology Research Centre of Excellence | Institute | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| New York University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Pennsylvania State University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Technical University of Berlin | University | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC) | University | Canada | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Alberta | University | Canada | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of California, Berkeley | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Edinburgh | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of New South Wales | University | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of North Texas | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Padova | University | Italy | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Pennsylvania | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Texas at Austin | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Toronto | University | Canada | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB) | Institute | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 23.1% |
| 2015 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 18.2% |
| 2016 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 27.3% |
| 2018 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 42.1% |
| 2019 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 42.9% |
| 2020 | 17 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 64.7% |
| Total | 97 | 39 | 12 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 58 | 40.2% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 5.7 | 14.5 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 32.4% |
| 2015 | 6.2 | 38.7 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 13.9% |
| 2016 | 3.7 | 42.8 | 11.4 | 1.2 | 31.2% |
| 2017 | 4.5 | 19.0 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 25.9% |
| 2018 | 7.4 | 15.8 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 48.7% |
| 2019 | 4.3 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 34.6% |
| 2020 | 7.9 | 4.6 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 45.9% |
| Total | 39.7 | 143.6 | 3.6 | 13.7 | 34.6% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 13.5 | 1.09 | 1.2 | 8.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 12.4 | 1.30 | 1.4 | 11.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 12.1 | 1.00 | 0.9 | 7.2% |
| 2017-2019 | 13.5 | 0.67 | 0.5 | 3.7% |
| Total | 27.1 | 0.88 | 1.7 | 6.1% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 82.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 11.8 | 0.82 | 1.5 | 12.6% |
| 2015-2017 | 9.8 | 0.82 | 1.8 | 18.6% |
| 2016-2018 | 10.1 | 0.83 | 2.1 | 20.9% |
| 2017-2019 | 11.9 | 0.78 | 1.2 | 9.8% |
| 2018-2020 | 14.7 | 0.83 | 2.5 | 17.1% |
| Total | 29.3 | 0.81 | 4.3 | 14.8% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 35 | 2 | 5.7% | 22 | 62.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 32 | 2 | 6.2% | 16 | 50.0% |
| 2016-2018 | 40 | 1 | 2.5% | 24 | 60.0% |
| 2017-2019 | 42 | 0 | 0.0% | 23 | 54.8% |
| 2018-2020 | 51 | 0 | 0.0% | 33 | 64.7% |
| Total | 96 | 2 | 2.1% | 58 | 60.4% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 82.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
