Overview

DIVISION OF HEALTH INFORMATICS AND LOGISTICS

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

9.1

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

53.2 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

88.5 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 53.2%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

DIVISION OF HEALTH INFORMATICS AND LOGISTICS

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 0.8 1.5 2.1 1.1 3.9 2.8 4.2 16.5 45.5% 0.9
Conference paper, peer review 6.9 4.4 2.8 3.4 3.3 2.3 3.7 26.8 58.0% 0.9
Conference paper, other 0.5 NA 2.0 NA 1.6 NA 0.2 4.3 5.8% 0.1
Chapter in book NA 0.3 NA 0.5 NA 1.5 NA 2.3 21.4% 0.6
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 2 3 7 3 10 8 11 44 59.1% 1
Conference paper, peer review 15 8 6 7 10 5 8 59 59.3% 1
Conference paper, other 1 NA 3 NA 3 NA 1 8 12.5% 0
Chapter in book NA 1 NA 1 NA 2 NA 4 25.0% 1
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA 1 1 1 1 4 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

DIVISION OF HEALTH INFORMATICS AND LOGISTICS

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 3.8 2.0 0.5 2.2 56.5%
2015 4.4 3.7 0.8 1.0 23.5%
2016 3.2 7.7 2.4 1.7 51.5%
2017 2.2 1.3 0.6 1.4 63.0%
2018 3.0 6.7 2.2 2.3 77.1%
Total 16.8 21.4 1.3 8.6 51.5%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 1.5 0.65 0.0 0.0%
2015-2017 1.6 0.67 0.0 0.0%
2016-2018 2.4 0.86 0.2 8.7%
2017-2019 2.8 0.67 0.2 7.5%
Total 4.3 0.66 0.2 4.9%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 5 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 38.7%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 35.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

DIVISION OF HEALTH INFORMATICS AND LOGISTICS

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 1.5 1.21 0.3 20.9%
2015-2017 1.6 1.11 0.3 18.8%
2016-2018 2.4 0.98 0.3 12.9%
2017-2019 2.8 0.56 0.0 0.0%
2018-2020 5.4 0.62 0.5 9.3%
Total 7.4 0.72 0.8 11.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 35.5%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

DIVISION OF HEALTH INFORMATICS AND LOGISTICS

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 6 0 0.0% 6 100.0%
2015-2017 6 0 0.0% 6 100.0%
2016-2018 9 0 0.0% 9 100.0%
2017-2019 10 0 0.0% 7 70.0%
2018-2020 18 1 5.6% 13 72.2%
Total 25 1 4.0% 20 80.0%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 47.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Netherlands 22 21 1 0 0 7.1
China 5 5 0 0 0 1.1
Italy 6 4 2 0 0 0.9
United States 3 2 1 0 0 0.9
Bangladesh 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Germany 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
Denmark 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Estonia 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
Kenya 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
Spain 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
Uganda 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
India 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Ireland 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Singapore 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 22 21 1 0 0 7.1
Uppsala University University Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 1.3
ProRail Other Public Netherlands 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
Kenteq Company Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Beihang University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Northeastern Univ Qinhuangdao University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Northeastern University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Marche Polytechnic University University Italy 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) University Bangladesh 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Radboud University Nijmegen University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Stevens Institute of Technology University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Sveriges Kommuner Och Landsting NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
George Washington University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
SWPS Univ Social Sci & Humanities University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Thales Research and Technology Company France 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Bremen University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Kenyatta University (KU) University Kenya 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
Uganda Industrial Research Institute (UIRI) Other Public Uganda 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
University of Pisa University Italy 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
University of Tartu University Estonia 3 2 1 0 0 0.3
BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Norway 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Shandong University of Finance and Economics University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Denmark (DTU) University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Groningen University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Vienna University of Economics and Business University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
NA NA Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
NA NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Madrid University Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (HvA) University College Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences University College Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Shanghai Jiao Tong University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Bioindustry Park Silvano Fumero (BiPCa) Other Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Polytechnic University of Turin University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Copenhagen University Hospitals University Hospital Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Hong Kong Polytechnic University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Karolinska University Hospital University Hospital Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Sophiahemmet University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Stockholms Sjukhem Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Swedish Red Cross Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Umeå University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Copenhagen University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Australian National University University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Carnegie Mellon University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Other Public Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Georgia Institute of Technology University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
IBM Corp Company India 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
IBM Corp Company Ireland 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
McGill University University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Microsoft Corporation Company United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Nanyang Technological University University Singapore 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
National Information and Communications Technology Research Centre of Excellence Institute Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
New York University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Pennsylvania State University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC) University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Alberta University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of California, Berkeley University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Edinburgh University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of New South Wales University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of North Texas University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Padova University Italy 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Pennsylvania University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Texas at Austin University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
University of Toronto University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.0
Zuse Institute Berlin (ZIB) Institute Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.0

Open Access

DIVISION OF HEALTH INFORMATICS AND LOGISTICS

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 13 3 0 0 2 1 10 23.1%
2015 11 2 0 0 2 0 9 18.2%
2016 12 6 1 3 2 0 6 50.0%
2017 11 3 0 2 1 0 8 27.3%
2018 19 8 4 3 1 0 11 42.1%
2019 14 6 4 2 0 0 8 42.9%
2020 17 11 3 5 2 1 6 64.7%
Total 97 39 12 15 10 2 58 40.2%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

DIVISION OF HEALTH INFORMATICS AND LOGISTICS

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.7 14.5 2.6 1.8 32.4%
2015 6.2 38.7 6.2 0.9 13.9%
2016 3.7 42.8 11.4 1.2 31.2%
2017 4.5 19.0 4.2 1.2 25.9%
2018 7.4 15.8 2.1 3.6 48.7%
2019 4.3 8.2 1.9 1.5 34.6%
2020 7.9 4.6 0.6 3.6 45.9%
Total 39.7 143.6 3.6 13.7 34.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 10 (full counted) publications with moderate Scopus coverage (at least 73.1%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 13.5 1.09 1.2 8.5%
2015-2017 12.4 1.30 1.4 11.3%
2016-2018 12.1 1.00 0.9 7.2%
2017-2019 13.5 0.67 0.5 3.7%
Total 27.1 0.88 1.7 6.1%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 82.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 11.8 0.82 1.5 12.6%
2015-2017 9.8 0.82 1.8 18.6%
2016-2018 10.1 0.83 2.1 20.9%
2017-2019 11.9 0.78 1.2 9.8%
2018-2020 14.7 0.83 2.5 17.1%
Total 29.3 0.81 4.3 14.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 31 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 82.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 35 2 5.7% 22 62.9%
2015-2017 32 2 6.2% 16 50.0%
2016-2018 40 1 2.5% 24 60.0%
2017-2019 42 0 0.0% 23 54.8%
2018-2020 51 0 0.0% 33 64.7%
Total 96 2 2.1% 58 60.4%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 82.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row